Mintvest Capital, LTD v. NYDIG Trust Company, et al.
Mintvest Capital, LTD v. NYDIG Trust Company, et al. is one matter in the Veritas record of US court proceedings involving AI-generated citations that could not be verified against the reporters named. The summary below is drawn from the underlying court document, linked at the foot of this page.
- Court
- D.C. Puerto Rico
- Date
- June 23, 2025
- Party
- Lawyer
- AI tool
- Claude
- Outcome
- Report and recommendation: Rule 11 sanctions recommended (fees or monetary)
- Penalty
- No monetary penalty in this order.
What the record shows
In a report and recommendation, the magistrate judge found that counsel's filings contained cases that do not exist, citations to content that does not exist, and misquotations, which the defendants attributed to AI use. The judge recommended Rule 11 sanctions, that counsel pay the defendants' attorney's fees, or in the alternative a monetary sanction, subject to objections.
This entry reflects the court document as filed. The citations at issue could not be located in the reporters named at the time of the order. The reading here is descriptive of the public record and is not legal advice.
Source documents
The test this filing did not run
Every matter in this record shares one mechanism: a citation that did not resolve to an opinion in the reporter named, in a brief that was filed before any verification step ran. Veritas runs that step. The Filing Risk Scanner extracts each citation, resolves it against reporter and public-record sources, and returns a verdict on each one — located, partial, or not located in reporter — before the brief is signed.
Run a free reviewBack to the full tracker →