Mid Cent. Operating Eng'rs Health v. Hoosiervac
Mid Cent. Operating Eng'rs Health v. Hoosiervac is one matter in the Veritas record of US court proceedings involving AI-generated citations that could not be verified against the reporters named. The summary below is drawn from the underlying court document, linked at the foot of this page.
- Court
- S.D. Ind.
- Date
- May 28, 2025
- Party
- Lawyer
- AI tool
- Not identified in the order
- Outcome
- Monetary penalty: $6,000
- Penalty
- $6,000 in monetary penalties.
What the record shows
Defense counsel Rafael Ramirez admitted relying on generative artificial intelligence tools that produced fictitious case citations, submitting briefs containing citations the magistrate judge could not locate on three separate occasions. The court found a violation of Rule 11 and, adopting the report and recommendation in part, personally sanctioned Mr. Ramirez $6,000 to deter repetition of comparable conduct.
This entry reflects the court document as filed. The citations at issue could not be located in the reporters named at the time of the order. The reading here is descriptive of the public record and is not legal advice.
Source documents
The test this filing did not run
Every matter in this record shares one mechanism: a citation that did not resolve to an opinion in the reporter named, in a brief that was filed before any verification step ran. Veritas runs that step. The Filing Risk Scanner extracts each citation, resolves it against reporter and public-record sources, and returns a verdict on each one — located, partial, or not located in reporter — before the brief is signed.
Run a free reviewBack to the full tracker →