Jane Doe v. Baltimore City Board of School Commissioners
Jane Doe v. Baltimore City Board of School Commissioners is one matter in the Veritas record of US court proceedings involving AI-generated citations that could not be verified against the reporters named. The summary below is drawn from the underlying court document, linked at the foot of this page.
- Court
- D. Maryland
- Date
- April 29, 2026
- Party
- Lawyer
- AI tool
- Not identified in the order
- Outcome
- No sanction imposed; fabricated citation disregarded
- Penalty
- No monetary penalty in this order.
What the record shows
The court declined, in its discretion, to consider a proposition drawn from a citation it described as fabricated, a 'quote' and 'citation' previously raised to plaintiff's counsel in an earlier letter order. The court resolved the cross-motions for summary judgment on other grounds; the provided text reflects no monetary or disciplinary sanction.
This entry reflects the court document as filed. The citations at issue could not be located in the reporters named at the time of the order. The reading here is descriptive of the public record and is not legal advice.
Source documents
The test this filing did not run
Every matter in this record shares one mechanism: a citation that did not resolve to an opinion in the reporter named, in a brief that was filed before any verification step ran. Veritas runs that step. The Filing Risk Scanner extracts each citation, resolves it against reporter and public-record sources, and returns a verdict on each one — located, partial, or not located in reporter — before the brief is signed.
Run a free reviewBack to the full tracker →