In re the Matter of: Abius Rosas Carreon
In re the Matter of: Abius Rosas Carreon is one matter in the Veritas record of US court proceedings involving AI-generated citations that could not be verified against the reporters named. The summary below is drawn from the underlying court document, linked at the foot of this page.
- Court
- CA Arizona
- Date
- February 4, 2026
- Party
- Pro Se Litigant
- AI tool
- Not identified in the order
- Outcome
- No sanction; brief found in violation of appellate rule
- Penalty
- No monetary penalty in this order.
What the record shows
The Court of Appeals of Arizona found that three of the five cases cited in Father's opening brief contained substantial defects, including unsupported premises and quotations that do not appear in the cited authorities. The court held the brief violated Arizona Rule of Civil Appellate Procedure 13(a)(7) and denied both parties' requests for attorney's fees; no monetary sanction was imposed.
This entry reflects the court document as filed. The citations at issue could not be located in the reporters named at the time of the order. The reading here is descriptive of the public record and is not legal advice.
Source documents
The test this filing did not run
Every matter in this record shares one mechanism: a citation that did not resolve to an opinion in the reporter named, in a brief that was filed before any verification step ran. Veritas runs that step. The Filing Risk Scanner extracts each citation, resolves it against reporter and public-record sources, and returns a verdict on each one — located, partial, or not located in reporter — before the brief is signed.
Run a free reviewBack to the full tracker →