In re the Marriage of Amy Haddock and Justin Blu Haddock
In re the Marriage of Amy Haddock and Justin Blu Haddock is one matter in the Veritas record of US court proceedings involving AI-generated citations that could not be verified against the reporters named. The summary below is drawn from the underlying court document, linked at the foot of this page.
- Court
- Tulsa County DC
- Date
- May 21, 2026
- Party
- Lawyer
- AI tool
- Not identified in the order
- Outcome
- Monetary sanction: $2,000; Oklahoma Bar Association notified
- Penalty
- $2,000 in monetary penalties.
What the record shows
The court found that Mr. Johnson, husband's counsel, filed a motion containing three citations to nonexistent law and three citations mischaracterizing the propositions for which real cases stood. The court sanctioned Mr. Johnson $2,000, payable into the court fund within thirty days, declined to impose additional sanctions, and stated it would contact the Oklahoma Bar Association about the order.
This entry reflects the court document as filed. The citations at issue could not be located in the reporters named at the time of the order. The reading here is descriptive of the public record and is not legal advice.
Source documents
The test this filing did not run
Every matter in this record shares one mechanism: a citation that did not resolve to an opinion in the reporter named, in a brief that was filed before any verification step ran. Veritas runs that step. The Filing Risk Scanner extracts each citation, resolves it against reporter and public-record sources, and returns a verdict on each one — located, partial, or not located in reporter — before the brief is signed.
Run a free reviewBack to the full tracker →