Gamez v. County of Fresno
Gamez v. County of Fresno is one matter in the Veritas record of US court proceedings involving AI-generated citations that could not be verified against the reporters named. The summary below is drawn from the underlying court document, linked at the foot of this page.
- Court
- E.D. California
- Date
- April 6, 2026
- Party
- Lawyer
- AI tool
- Not identified in the order
- Outcome
- Order to show cause why counsel should not be sanctioned; motion to dismiss granted
- Penalty
- No monetary penalty in this order.
What the record shows
The court found that an opposition brief filed by attorney Kevin Little cited authority that does not exist, included quotations the court could not locate in authority that does exist, and made legal representations without support, indicating reliance on generative AI without ensuring accuracy. The court directed Attorney Little to show cause why he should not be sanctioned.
This entry reflects the court document as filed. The citations at issue could not be located in the reporters named at the time of the order. The reading here is descriptive of the public record and is not legal advice.
Source documents
The test this filing did not run
Every matter in this record shares one mechanism: a citation that did not resolve to an opinion in the reporter named, in a brief that was filed before any verification step ran. Veritas runs that step. The Filing Risk Scanner extracts each citation, resolves it against reporter and public-record sources, and returns a verdict on each one — located, partial, or not located in reporter — before the brief is signed.
Run a free reviewBack to the full tracker →