Ege Kilinc v. PMMUE Eduservices Private Limited, et al.
Ege Kilinc v. PMMUE Eduservices Private Limited, et al. is one matter in the Veritas record of US court proceedings involving AI-generated citations that could not be verified against the reporters named. The summary below is drawn from the underlying court document, linked at the foot of this page.
- Court
- S.D. New York
- Date
- November 21, 2025
- Party
- Lawyer
- AI tool
- Not identified in the order
- Outcome
- Order to examine and certify every citation
- Penalty
- No monetary penalty in this order.
What the record shows
The magistrate judge identified a number of fabricated quotations and citations in plaintiff's reply memorandum, giving three examples of quotations that do not appear in the cited decisions. The court directed plaintiff to examine every citation in the filing and submit a sworn statement listing each improper citation with an explanation, reserving any order to show cause for later.
This entry reflects the court document as filed. The citations at issue could not be located in the reporters named at the time of the order. The reading here is descriptive of the public record and is not legal advice.
Source documents
The test this filing did not run
Every matter in this record shares one mechanism: a citation that did not resolve to an opinion in the reporter named, in a brief that was filed before any verification step ran. Veritas runs that step. The Filing Risk Scanner extracts each citation, resolves it against reporter and public-record sources, and returns a verdict on each one — located, partial, or not located in reporter — before the brief is signed.
Run a free reviewBack to the full tracker →