VERITAS
April 14, 2025 · AI sanctions database

Crystal Truong, et al. v. Flint Hills Resources, LLC, et al.

Crystal Truong, et al. v. Flint Hills Resources, LLC, et al. is one matter in the Veritas record of US court proceedings involving AI-generated citations that could not be verified against the reporters named. The summary below is drawn from the underlying court document, linked at the foot of this page.

Court
S.D. Texas
Date
April 14, 2025
Party
Lawyer
AI tool
Not identified in the order
Outcome
Order to show cause
Penalty
No monetary penalty in this order.
Show cause

What the record shows

The court issued a second order to show cause after finding that plaintiffs' briefing relied on authorities the court and opposing counsel could not locate, including a cited case the court found may have been invented to misrepresent the pleading standard, and reporter citations that corresponded to unrelated cases. The court ordered plaintiffs' counsel to appear and show cause why they should not be sanctioned, making no findings on the merits.

This entry reflects the court document as filed. The citations at issue could not be located in the reporters named at the time of the order. The reading here is descriptive of the public record and is not legal advice.

Source documents

Primary court document ↗

The test this filing did not run

Every matter in this record shares one mechanism: a citation that did not resolve to an opinion in the reporter named, in a brief that was filed before any verification step ran. Veritas runs that step. The Filing Risk Scanner extracts each citation, resolves it against reporter and public-record sources, and returns a verdict on each one — located, partial, or not located in reporter — before the brief is signed.

Run a free reviewBack to the full tracker →

Filed under · AI sanctions database · S.D. Texas